Thursday, April 30, 2009

"Justice" continued

Hello Readers.

Below you will find a lengthy update to my story concerning the independent administration of justice. To display the scans conveniently, please click on "April" under "blog archive" and scroll down to pages 1-2 and work your way up. I will by typing this stuff up whenever I can.

I am pleased, also, to report that Lesvos offers a great deal in the way of hiking. Penelope and I went on a 5 hour trek up a mountain covered in olive groves and wildflowers yesterday. From the top we had clear views of the Turkish main and a whiff of paradise. Exquisite.

And for a refresher on the initial salvos of the "Justice" story, please click here and here.

Pages 35-36

Posted by Picasa

Pages 33-34

Posted by Picasa

Pages 31-32

Posted by Picasa

Pages 29-30

Posted by Picasa

Pages 27-28

Posted by Picasa

Pages 25-26

Posted by Picasa

Pages 23-24

Posted by Picasa

Pages 21-22

Posted by Picasa

Pages 19-20

Posted by Picasa

Pages 17-18

Posted by Picasa

Page 15-16

Posted by Picasa

Pages 13-14

Posted by Picasa

Pages 11-12

Posted by Picasa

Pages 9-10

Posted by Picasa

Pages 7-8

Posted by Picasa

Pages 5-6

Posted by Picasa

Pages 3-4

Posted by Picasa

Pages 1-2

Posted by Picasa

Tuesday, April 28, 2009

A brewer is born...

Please click on the image below to read my latest post, penned from the isle of Lesvos. And don't forget: We have German enemies in America too. And the worst of all our German enemies, the most treacherous, the most menacing, are Pabst, Schlitz, Blatz, and Miller.

Tuesday, April 21, 2009

The Long Drive

April 20, 2009

Karystos, Evia

 

 

Montana is done and I am in Greece, and it is time, dear readers, to fill you in on at least a few of the constituent elements of my most recent time of silence, wrested bit by bit from the very maw of oblivion. The Bitterroots are an entire hemisphere away, and let me tell you how I left them. Oh boy let me tell you. So that the month and change since my last significant anonymous epistolary activity can at least begin to escape the grim cipher of solipsism that will corrode and erase all uncommunicated experiences without our keenest efforts to pickle them in words. So: A tale of departure for now, and with ample additions on the parade of days that concluded my time in the Bitterroots soon to follow, not to mention an ample supplement to my short story, awaiting reclassification as a novella, on the administration of justice. To be succeeded in turn by an account of arrival and a fumbling, asymptotic attempt to grasp the forever fleeing present.

 

The end to my winter in the cabin was as sudden and eventful as the start. Between shifts in service to the parasitical juggernaut that alienates me from the fruit of my labor and my well-nigh frantic attempts to sap the mountains of as much experience as possible before leaving them, I was not totally prepared for the end when it came. What I mean to say is that Nystrom's Pride was not prepared for its drive halfway across the yawning continent. About a week before setting off for my father's town in Wisconsin where I'd planned to leave the vehicle, and other possessions unsuited to overseas travel, the timing belt failed. The timing of which failure was good, of course, inasmuch as it did not happen during the drive itself. I had no idea what had caused the engine to fail at the time, of course. I walked to the nearest gas station from where the truck had failed and called AAA. They came promptly and towed me to a garage in town called Sober Automotive. Sober was run by a friendly guy named Greg. His first impression was that the engine had seized up and that cylinder heads would have to be rebuilt. If that had been the case I would have abandoned my eponymous Pride with no further ado and asked Darren to drive me to the railroad in the northern part of the state for my journey east. But it turned out to be the timing belt, which was less serious, so we went ahead. He fixed the problem at what I think was a fair price, and had the truck ready for me the day before my departure.  But while running errands after picking it up, I discovered that the repair to the engine had either uncovered or exacerbated another serious problem - a significant oil leak. Since it hadn't leaked on his lot, Greg had failed to detect it. And by the time I noticed the bleeding there was no time (for Greg) to wash the engine down and troubleshoot it. Darren theorized that the new timing belt and pulley assembly and whatever tightening of screws Greg had undertaking in his repair had increased the pressure in the engine to its normal level and accelerated a leak that had been able to fly under the radar while the engine was operating at reduced pressure. Theories aside, I bought a few quarts of oil and decided on a course of wait and see. I spent the rest of that day in a flurry of packing, cleaning and preparing, hoping for the best as Nystrom's Pride bled in the drive.

      The morning of the big day was crisp, sunny and hopeful. I said my goodbyes to Darren and Tipper, topped off with half a quart after starting the engine and determining, sure enough, that the oil was low, and was off.

      I will unburden you of any suspense from the start and tell you that the truck made it. But not without going through--get ready for this--50 quarts of 10W-30. It did not take long to determine that the engine required constant topping off, and I had settled on increments of a quart or a quart and change every 40 miles by the time I'd made it halfway across the majestic Big Hole basin. It wasn't long before the rhythm of the drive was as regular as a beating heart: With a raptor's eye to the thermostat and the odometer, I would drive 35 miles or so, usually getting most of the way through a cassette tape (I was equipped with Fine Young Cannibals, Wagner's greatest movements, the best of Piotr, Pavel and Marya, a Snoop single and REM's 1988 album Green--the very same color that was later officially adopted by Snoop) and a liberal pinch of chewing tobacco (I went through pouches of Beechnut, Taylor's Pride, Levi Garret and Red Man) and then began scanning for an exit not too far to either side of the 40 mile mark. Then the dirty work would start: Slow down, pull off, coast down to the apron at the start of the on-ramp, cut the engine, turn on the hazards, get out, empty spittoon and bladder as needed, pop the hood, check the dipstick, unscrew the cap, add a quart or a quart and change through a party head, recheck the level, replace the cap, start the car, roar back into action--always leaving a significant oil patch on the ground where I had parked--and see that it was good.

 

In this way I covered 500 miles the first day--spending the night in a Super 8 in Miles City, MT--and 700 the next, which got me as far as the Mississippi River at Minneapolis. There were a couple of incidents that interrupted and added color to my insane routine, the first of which came halfway between Butte and Bozeman, where I was unable to tend to my oil on the shoulder of I-90 and was unable, for about ten minutes, to close the hood. The latch had been beaten out of shape by hard use and I could not get it to catch. After banging and prodding in vain for about ten minutes as traffic cresting the pass stampeded past my sorry rig, I settled on a provisional solution involving a piece of hanger wire harvested from my garment bag in the back.

 

The next tight spot came later that day during a top-off just east of Billings, when the wind was blowing so hard off the plain that it jarred the hood off its prop and would have sent it crashing into my skull had it not been for my Beechnut-primed reflexes. The night at the Super 8 was notable for the fact that I was able to enjoy high-speed Internet for the first time in 3 months, a privilege I used to watch a streaming episode of The Office. NBC is funding this post, in case you couldn't tell. As is the Beechnut Group. Toyota didn't want anything to do with it.

 

I left before dawn the following morning. Mostly to get a jump on the day, but also to prevent any of the hotel staff from noticing the rather voluminous territorial markings made overnight by Nystrom's Pride. My shame at its leakiness had also put me in the habit of parking in the back or off to the side whenever I ducked into a gas station to buy another ten quarts of 10W-30, or however many they had. My interactions at such times were cut from a single piece of cloth: I would lurch up to the counter with my armload of oil; the clerk would raise her eyebrows and say something like 'You must really need some oil'; and I would respond 'Oh no, not at all, these aren't for me, these are party favors.'

 

The next little issue cropped up just shy of Fargo, ND, and would haunt me for the rest of the drive. When I was forced to brake more sharply than usual on an offramp, Nystrom's Pride fishtailed and nearly flipped. The right front brake had failed. I will not go into the reasoning behind opting to continue rather than having the brakes serviced in Fargo, or even in Minneapolis the next day. Suffice it to say that I did continue, and that Nystrom's Pride made it, relying on transmission braking as I limped my way down the Red River Valley, across the Mississippi, and into Chippewa country and Packer-Land as the remaining brakes continued to deteriorate with every push of the pedal. I acknowledge my foolhardiness and offer no excuses. It is hard for me to brook any alteration to a trajectory once set, danger be damned. A common human failing, I suppose.

 

In Minneapolis I enjoyed the company and hospitality of my friends Tobin and Jenna. I arrived at 10 and was up talking until 2. We talked about what was on everybody's mind: Depression, want, contingency plans, the specter of violence. I feel some wonder, looking back, that I was able to carry on a coherent conversation after 17 hours of uninterrupted and unsafe vigilance, making use of fragments like 'Such is the nature...' or 'And so it goes...' or 'Thus it was decided.' Remarkable. I was running on physical, intellectual and moral fumes. Nor was I much restored the following morning. But I had managed to top off my powers to the point where they were able to handle the 240 miles that stretched out between me and my father's home amid the potato fields of north-central Wisconsin. And that was all I needed. At some point that afternoon I added maybe a quart too many to the engine. For about five minutes afterwards, I was trailing a towering plume of smoke as the excess mixed in with the fuel and burned off. People in the passing lane tried studiously to avoid looking at me. When the plume had subsided I thanked Allah and lesser deities that there had been no enforcement officials around to nail me.

 

Once I'd limped into Antigo with the brakes catching hardly at all and set my feet on the same ground that will serve Nystrom's Pride for a hospice as she rusts through seasons to come, I jumped for joy and collapsed in relief. The next 48 hours or so passed in a delirium of fatigue. From time to time I would drift off and begin casting about in that mental darkness for the thermostat, for the 40 mile mark, for the mother lode of 10W-30. Once I started awake in the middle of the night, wondering how I would ever make it through North Dakota.

Saturday, April 18, 2009

Peace

I have moved to Greece to be with Penelope.


We watched a Franco-Algerian movie the night before last about the assassination of the Greek politician Labrakis who offered resistance to the junta. It was called "Z" and was filmed 40 years ago. In addition to reinforcing my conviction as to the general indecency of social configuration in the modern state in all its forms, the movie deeply impressed me with its ethical depiction of violence. The state's goons are neither glorified nor caricatured. More to the point, the episodes of violence themselves elicit deep discomfort. They are chaotic, graceless, and above all aesthetically ugly. Violence is not offered as a currency to be conquered, hoarded and dispensed by the victor, but rather as a dehumanized and dehumanizing course of action that tars all who consent to become involved with it. There was none of the typically American, aestheticized and choreographed appeal to the violence. Nor--which is particularly significant--was there any trace of longing for counterviolence in the mise en scene. No promise of the redemption we have been taught, from the very first, to expect from violent reaction to injustice. This is realistic inasmuch as non-state actors who challenge the monopoly on violence are subject to summary elimination in the real world, and this escape from historical fantasy is by itself to be regarded as an achievement.

 

In our time, a time still so thoroughly dominated by the eternal promise of state violence on the one hand, and by the inexpressible, almost universal longing for total destruction of the state and of authority itself through an apotheosis of violence on the other, this kind of restraint in the depiction of violence seems nothing short of miraculous. I would compare it to the moral discipline of a person who finds a million dollars and who, instead of keeping it or returning it to the state, simply destroys it.

 

A wild thought, to be sure. This realization--of the difficulty of even beginning to conceive of peace--makes our situation seem all the more hellish and intractable. Yet the plain fact that a principled documentation of violence (that is to say, one that does not aestheticize it, succumbing to violence as eye candy, violence as a currency and commodity to be sought after and striven for) seems so subversive, contains the seed of liberation from that very intractable place. To soar up into the blue sky of utopian theory for a moment: If enough people are disabused of their received attitudes toward violence, the state may lose its sanction to wield it without limit. All proceeds from the regard for a single human life, which is holy.

 

To create a work of mass entertainment--moreso on celluloid than on cellulose--informed by this ethic is a considerable achievement, not least considering the ideological resistance that must be overcome on all sides in order to proceed, from the funders who must discipline the blood-thirst of their money to the actors who must discipline the blood-thirst of their emotions to the principals themselves, who must discipline the blood-thirst of their narration.

 

I have never felt as strongly allied to peace as I do this morning. It is the only impossibility worthy of our faith. I mean impossibility in the general sense: Violent repression and reprisal will always exist, and is inseparable from out nature. We must acknowledge this as the mariner acknowledges the shoals and the reefs that characterize his profession and constitute its boundary conditions. However, I do not mean 'impossibility' in the contingent sense. Through individual acts of grace and declarations of our faith in peace, especially when braided into a collective, with all its emergent strengths, we can check the evil and the chaos that threaten to engulf the world. What weapon can we possibly hope to deploy against atom bombs and Predator drones but our faith in peace?

 

This is my position: So much as a single additional act of violence is intolerable. Our only weapon against injustice--against the state, our enemy--is peace. It is a position that bears and requires reiteration every single day. To close this preliminary investigative seam I might offer this, by way of alloying this rather impractical and ineffable declaration: We must see the world for what it is. In order to be against violence (or against any given adversary) in any effective way, we must know what it is, know what constitutes it; we must accept the reality of it, we must accept the contingent, horrible realities it sprouts and the antecedent, horrible realities in which it is footed. Better: In order to declare it ethically unacceptable, we begin by accepting it ontologically. Or, winnowed down to the paradoxical kernel that is characteristic of all difficult truths: In order to declare X unacceptable, we must first have accepted it. Those who hope to make any dent in the armor and armories of merciless violence that rules the world must be equipped with the philosophical moves as dexterous as those of a ninja.

 

Very well. There are two things I want to get at here: Now that we have accepted violence ontologically, we must understand the scope of negative action to which it is susceptible, the true general purpose of opposing it (rather than the stated one), and what is the emancipatory attitude toward our own purpose in opposing it. First, since violence is an elementary player on our stage, a sine qua non in human affairs, its scope of susceptibility is a battle rather than a war. We must address it contingently, through actions or non-actions, after having thought about it generally. We may hope to prevent one murder, one execution, one act of torture, one war, but not to eliminate the category, which would consign us to wither among the vast horde of the irrelevant. The purpose of opposing it can be explained in a variety of ultimately unsatisfactory ways: To maintain a kind of rough equilibrium between good and evil that allows conscientious human life to continue is one way of conceiving of our purpose. How to raise children in good faith if we do not first offer resistance to evil? This equilibrium will not obtain in a vacuum. Power is undergoing a more or less incessant process of consolidation, and conscientious human life is succumbing to an overwhelming tide of dispossession, moral and physical regression, and the incessant conversion of man into slave. Many have concluded, perhaps with reason, that it might be best to dispense with the bequest entirely.

 

I think the truth is more closely (and more hopefully) approximated by saying that our (we know who we are) purpose in opposing violence is the fulfillment of our allotted roles. I think certain Enlightenment fictions make us take great pains to make our attitudes seem the result of choice, and I think that this is a sham. Each of us is born to be something, and our task reduces to fully being that something. Why does the poet write? Why does the boxer box? Why does the gambler wager? They are following their inclinations; they are articulating themselves; they are unfolding. Peace may seem revolutionary, impossible, eschatological, extraordinary--but those who seek to promote it were born to do so. They take their place in the pageant beside the gibbering horde born into the world to purvey and condone violence. And nobody will ever stop them from being what they are until being itself is arrested.

 

There is both oppression and emancipation in this tenet that holds that we are merely taking a lap around the track, clutching the baton we were born to hold before passing it on to the next generation, who will feel the same confusion as they receive it and sprint headlong toward their destiny. This is the irrefutable counterargument to Judge Holden's grim declaration in McCarthy's Blood Meridian that war was there before man was, and was waiting for men to wage it. Peace, too, was there, and it is still waiting for the people to make it real. Go then: Know what you are, and then be it!

 

~

 

Is decency inexpressible? Is it ineffable? Is suicide the logical conclusion of a moral stance of decency, given that it prevails in the face of every contingency? After all, matters as fundamental as eating require complex, invisible declarations of moral choice, of opting.